|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Can he then claim social security and become a burden on the state?<br /><br />In the UK pension funds have to be used to buy an annuity, ostensibly in order to prevent that kind of thing, which in my view is very unlikely. No doubt the real reason is to support the insurance industry.<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I believe one joins the queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Piggy Bank
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
it's their money to spend
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
retirement won't be as much fun when all the money and women are gone
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Then he's drunk, laid and hoarse.
Actually there are limits to how much you can withdraw from an IRA without penalty. The theory of SS is that you've paid in, so you get it back (almost as if you bought an annuity) but in reality that's not how the money is handled. You're not a 'burden on the state' but you're getting back because you paid in. And if you read your annual statement, you'll see that the amount you're scheduled to receive is only an estimate and you might not get anything at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
sell there blood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
He ends up singing for his supper!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Social security is nowhere near enough to live off of. So they're more likely to become a burden on their families.
Most companies don't do pensions, these days. At best it is matching funds in an investment account. And yes, they can blow it all and be out of luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
In the US, Social Security and private pensions are paid concurrently.
A typical retiree might get $13,000/yr as a social security benefit while also having a $12,000/yr pension entitlement. If that retiree decided to take that $12,000/yr as a lump sum, say $150,000, there is nothing stopping him from buying as much wine, women, or songs he wants. However, he'll be stuck living on $13,000/yr (with inflation) for the rest of his life. This is a poverty-line level of income in many states so that person may have the ability to apply for welfare. The more insidious problem though is the person who takes the $150,000 lump sum and thinks he can invest it and come out ahead. This person dutifully invests his money and only draws it down slowly but winds up running out of money in his early 80's with no way to get it back or develop a new income. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
In the US.... Pensions and Social Security are 2 TOTALLY different things..
The former is a voluntary contribution that has a finite amount and would be what was blown in this example.. The latter is an endless monthly stipend the retiree gets until the day they die, regardless of whether they had a private pension or not. The only difference the private pension makes.... is how much of his social security check ends up being Federally taxable as income.... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|